The results of the participants are in. The following teams have entered their final results: South East University (Falcon-AO), University of Pittsburgh (Prior), Tsinghua University (KEG), University of Leipzig (COMA++), and Università degli Studi di Milano (HMatch).
The results of the participants can be found here
The Gold Standard used to evaluate Precision and Recall can be found here
A web tool for the assessment of the results has been set up at the Free University Amsterdam. Participants have been contacted personally about their assessment loads.
An example assessment page can be found here or at the following web address:
http://prauw.cs.vu.nl/~wrvhage/oaei2006
RiMOM | Falcon-AO | Prior | COMA++ | HMatch | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
biological & chemical mappings | 0.85 | 0.8 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.83 | |
taxonomical mappings | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.48 | |
miscellaneous mappings (geography, legislation, food stuffs, etc.) | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.7 | 0.8 | |
all-round | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 0.61 |
The Falcon-AO system of South East University has a significantly better Precision than all other systems at mapping taxonomical and miscellaneous concepts (such as geographical concepts and food stuffs). The RiMOM system of Tsinghua University (KEG) has a significantly better Precision than all other systems at mapping biological and chemical concepts.
RiMOM | Falcon-AO | Prior | COMA++ | HMatch | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
considering only exactMatch mappings | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.65 |
considering all types of mappings | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.46 |
OAEI 2006 food results presentation
Send any questions, comments, or suggestions to:
Willem Robert van Hage (
)