The BeyondEquivalence track evaluates ontology matching systems on their ability to detect relations beyond equivalence. This better reflects real-world ontology alignment scenarios, where ontologies may differ in structure, granularity, and classification perspective.
Five mutually disjoint relation types are included:
This track addresses the need for alignment approaches capable of capturing nuanced relationships, enabling richer semantic integration for tasks such as knowledge graph merging, master data integration, and semantic search.
The benchmark dataset suite is publicly available via Zenodo:
As part of the data is extracted from eClass, which is a non-public industrial product classification standard, usage of the eClass-derived data must comply with the terms of the eClass License.The datasets come from three major sources: Product Classification Standards (GPC, UNSPSC, ETIM, and eClass,), and STROMA/TaSeR Test Cases [1,2]. They vary in size, structure, and semantic complexity, and all reference alignments are annotated with explicit relation types.
Data Source | Dataset | # S:Class | # T:Class | # S:Property | # T:Property | ≡ | ≥ | ≤ | ≃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product Classification Standards | GPC–UNSPSC | 1,151 | 30,707 | 839 | 3 | 255 | 1,377 | 250 | 17,738 |
GPC–UNSPSC+ | 5,342 | 30,707 | 839 | 3 | 381 | 3,306 | 1,293 | 23,600 | |
ETIM–eClass | 2,877 | 5,565 | 10,746 | 8,932 | 2,371 | 380 | 636 | 291 | |
eClass–UNSPSC | 7,349 | 19,600 | 4,009 | 3 | 329 | 1,533 | 351 | 55,573 | |
eClass–GPC | 3,459 | 1,210 | 2,027 | 2,064 | 251 | 431 | 1,199 | 11,014 | |
STROMA/TaSeR | g1–web | 728 | 1,132 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 26 | 29 | — |
g2–diseases | 1,109 | 5,146 | 0 | 0 | 316 | 11 | 27 | — | |
g3–text | 335 | 260 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 267 | 425 | — | |
g5–groceries | 60 | 335 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 113 | 14 | — | |
g7–literature | 41 | 155 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 52 | 18 | — |
For inquiries or to request evaluation support, please contact the track organizers:
[1] Arnold, P., Rahm, E.: Enriching ontology mappings with semantic relations. Data & Knowledge Engineering 93, 1–18 (2014)
[2] Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: Transformer based semantic relation typing for knowl- edge graph integration. In: European Semantic Web Conference. pp. 105–121. Springer (2023)